We averted "game over" on Nov. 3

The most striking thing about the election for me is how enormous, how complete the environmental choice was. In the view of many climate scientists, had Trump been reelected, it would have been "game over" for the planet. It's startling to say so; it sounds hyperbolic. And yet that's where we're at. The IPCC says we have till 2030 to reduce emissions 50%. If we don't, there's no chance of getting to net zero carbon emissions by 2050 and holding warming to 1.5ºC (almost 3ºF). We're now living with warming of 1.0ºC. Imagine 1.5º, let alone 2.0º.

12 views4 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Michael Mann interview

The recent Observer interview with eminent climate scientist Michael Mann is chock-full of important ideas. For starters, he makes a strong case for the continuing cyberwar being conducted by Russia a

A recent article in WaPo on carbon tax

My students have to write an essay at the end of the semester on what best policy or groups of policies will help us (humanity, Americans?) bring about the fastest reversal of the climate trend. We u

Is reforestation good "geo-engineering"?

Recently an article in the international press touted the promise of massive reforestation as a way to "capture carbon" out of the atmosphere. Some claimed perhaps erroneously that a trillion trees c